XAircraft America
Member
I just PMed you both. Anyone who is active on the forums and wants to try out the SuperX I am happy go give you a deal in exchange for spreading the word.
That is what I really love about the SuperX, unlike the Naza or other FC’s that fight you in GPS mode, the SuperX does not feel any different than atti mode at all, it is just smooth and then when you stop it just sits there.
So far everyone I have let fly my rigs with SuperX on them wants one.
Hello Drew, the part about GPS not fighting the Pilot is appealing.
We fly a host of birds using DJI FC's. We've found a couple of stable versions of the DJI FW and as a result have had good results. However, have also had GPS dropouts which did NOT transition smoothly to Atti and were quite scary. Consequently, we've only used RTH on our larger birds once to test and have never flipped the switch again. Similarly we don't flip any DJI related feature such as waypoints, Point of Interest, IOC etc. It would be nice to have a FC which would give a consistent and smooth GPS for filming and an RTH that inspired confidence as opposed to fear. Any feature set beyond this would be bonus. Additionally we fly Flat 4's, Flat 6's, Flat 8s and Coax 8s. When you crack the Coax/Asymmetrical mix definitely interested.
So let me ask you this, beyond what you've already indicated, what do YOU think SuperX does better than either the DJI Wookong/A2 and Naza lines?
Looking forward to your response, genuinely.
SMP
The biggest and most noticeable improvements are 1) The way it flies in GPS mode 2) How smoothly it transitions from GPS to ATT mode (you can't tell) 3) How well the RTH works. It will about freak you out how fast it flies back the first time you do it 4) How fast the GPS gets a lock after you have done the first calibration, it is usually around 10 seconds for 9+ satellites.
The SuperX does not have all of the bells and whistles that the DJI products do, BUT every feature on the SuperX works and will give you confidence to use them. I think that many of you who don't use GPS right now may decide to make the switch for some types of shoots because it lets you concentrate more on getting the shot and less on keeping it in the air.
On the larger multis you will literally be able to park it in a spot and let go of the sticks. It is jaw dropping. SleepyC (Stephen) can confirm. In addition, the performance in the wind is outstanding. I know it might sound like I am blowing a bunch of smoke because I sell them, but it really is that good.
The only thing that is a bit of a pain is calibrating the compass. I recommend doing it any time you go more than a few miles away. It doesn't take long to do, but with a large hex or octo it can be awkward. Wish there was a way around it, but just wanted to make a full disclosure!
Appreciate the response, if the biggest headache is Compass Calibration, that's a win! One thing DJI does very well is Keep it Simple Stupid in their FC Setups. I know some FCs perform very well but need an advanced degree in engineering... We've gotten decent at PIDs with the gimbals but how is the SuperX compared to DJI in GUI Setup and Configuration.
OMG ! What a hoot!! I haven't laughed so hard in months. And, like all really good humor, only slightly removed from the truth. *This* is the reason I read these forums! "Poon-Yang", still laughing.
I just PMed you both. Anyone who is active on the forums and wants to try out the SuperX I am happy go give you a deal in exchange for spreading the word.
kloner, have you tried these?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/22/tech/innovation/apparently-this-matters-shreddies/index.html
Does Super X have waypoints and a datalink?