Darko, I can promise you they know the problems at hand. Your frustration is loud and clear, we are all in the same boat. The question isnt if they are working their asses off on this. The real question is, at what point in time is it fair to surrender efforts if a solution doesn't arrive in a "fair" amount of time? I think this would go for any business in this situation. There has to be some defined agreement as to how long one is expected to sit idle. I suppose those of us that actually have jobs using these will just buy other equipment to cover the down time. I do feel a little in lingo and certainly unprepared for my next event. My DJI is the back up heli now but the gimbal control on that is unacceptable as well. I am very close to going back to a single rotor with mechanical gimbal. Too many electronics gets to be excessively complicated. The 360 gimbal we used for the last job was entirely mechanical and worked great. being as though roll is the only axis that really needs to be stabilized, a pendulum with shock absorber works almost as well. And it needs NO tuning or correct voltages. I'm just saying, we have come to a point where so many factors of how our crafts fly are computer dependent, that we are lost when these things arise. And as we are in testing stages on a lot new technologies that are out, we are destined to see more and more guinea pig stages, not less.
