So, with the myriad of other things to attend to I have only now got around to looking at these GH2 patches.
First off, let's try the Sanity5, it being recommended as a 'soft' hack that "... at least improves upon the stock firmware but does not place any real strain on the data transfer process, even permitting use of standard class 10 SD cards. A quick look at the changed options shows FSH bitrates increased to 44MB from the stock 16MB.
Having already recorded two tripod mounted 10 second clips on a Sandisk Extreme Class 10, 45MB/s, 16GB SD with the standard firmware I then recorded two more identical clips, FSH and HBR, with the Sanity5 patch. Oddly, the movie file sizes were smaller for both Sanity5 options:
Original FSH: 149.6MB
Sanity5 FSH: 147.7MB
Original HBR: 150.4MB
Sanity5 HBR: 149.1MB
Playing them back full screen in FCP I was damned if I could see any appreciable difference between Original FSH and Sanity5 FSH or Original HBR and Sanity5 HBR. In fact the best looking image of all of them was Original FSH !!
Okay, so now let's try a big boy. EOSHD Vanilla 44 with the super expensive Sandisk Extreme Pro 95MB/s, 64GB. It lasted about 17 seconds (this is on a tripod remember) before the Write Error came up and froze the whole camera. So I initialised the card using the SD Formatter that someone here linked to and tried again. No change.
The PTool has two sets of Patches, 'users' and 'testers'. One assumes from this that the 'user patches' are the safe ones and that the 'tester patches' are for the more adventurous types with loads of available geek time. Personally, I don't go near the 'tester' patches because the thing I am the utmost fervently disinterested in in this the whole wide world is computer programming parameter $hit. I want a camera that prodiuces a good usable image with as least fuss as possible and it has to be 100% reliable. Simple.
So, precisely what is great about these famous GH2 patches?