Has anyone run the KDE esc's off a Wookong and experienced any problems? Will any of the esc settings have to be change in order for them to work well with the flight controller, or is it a case of you can simply hook them up and away you go?
Hi Rob. I would guess it is related. I can't imagine it's a blocking issue although it's presented as if it is. Wouldn't you think as long as the opto-isolators are powered, and the PWM range is 1100-1900us it should be OK? Or maybe the Hoverfly compatibility issue has since been sorted, just not updated here?Hmmm... I wonder if this is related to the problem with Pixhawk and the KDE ESC's. Could it be an issue with the voltage level of the PWM signal coming from Pixhawk? The Pixhawk voltage level is only 3.3V. What is the Hoverfly?
I think all other MR manufacturers should take a leaf out of KDE's book in terms of customer engagement. Just read about the shaft issues on the Freefly sight and was very impressed with how KDE dealt with it. Ive also just fitted some 5215s with the 55A ESCs and so far they have knocked the U7s well into touch.
Just in case you are using Pixhawk, keep this in mind:Thanks guys! That's what I thought but trying to line up my X's and O's for testing, looking for anything I might do to screw things up
(from APM documentation)KDE (and other) Opto Isolated ESCs
The KDEXF-UAS and KDEF-UASHV Series are opto-solated and do not provide BEC power output for the peripheral equipment. They require +5V to power the opto-isolator and while the Pixhawk can be powered from the servo rail, it does not provide +5V to the servo rail. The ESCs must be powered by a BEC or with a jumper from an unused connector on the board. It is strongly recommended that you use a BEC to power the rail rather than a jumper. Do not add servos or other devices to the servo rail as the power module is not intended to supply power to them.
The KDE ESCs have fixed PWM ranges so you must manually set the output range of each PWM signal so that RCx_MIN is 1100 and RCx_MAX is 1900us using the Advanced Parameter or Full Parameter Settings Page in the planner.
Your motor outputs look much better. If you look at the motor output graph, you will see when your were yawing around how the motor outputs changed evenly. I still say you could use a little more gain on pitch and roll. Also try combinations of .1 difference on pitch and roll. I ended up .1 lower on my pitch then roll, and haven't changed or touched the gain knob in over 50 hrs.Ok, back from latest test flight. Hot day but mostly calm so good day for tweaking.
Set all my internal gains at 1.0 and g knob at 16% when zero'd out. Seems to behave best when I bring the g-knob down to what ends up at 0% in the X-box report. My vibes are down except for a couple points that pushed it up near 1 but it seems like the one big spike came around the time I had a voltage surge. Not sure what that's about. Overall a pretty good flight, motor output seems pretty balanced but the #1 motor is slightly lower and #4 is slightly higher than the rest on average power draw chart. Will look at those two, again...
Got about 11 minutes flight before landing, didn't get a low voltage warning, checked batts and they were at 22%.
Working on a short video of rig at hover for motor sound while tuning, for now, latest log report: http://log.xaircraft.com/report.htm#2015_08_18_074105.250_132.1.11.59
Thanks
Didn't realize you already got to the point of twitching.Thanks @fltundra. So when you I could a little "more gain", I should try 1.1 on P & R?
I tweaked the #1 & 4 motors again to see if that improves it any. I have tried 1.1 in the past but it seemed even twitchier.
Tomorrow is another day, for testing.