Hey, did it ever occur that it might be the mistakes your making or lack of building skills?
Yes and no, my extended arm Disco with 22 pole pancakes flew better with the Castle MR ESCs than it did on SimonK ESCs but still not as well as with "normal" motors on any type of ESC. That is they worked well right up until one of them burst into flames while executing a turn to come in for a landing! I have to say, that's an experience I've never had before, I've had connectors fail and ESCs lose a phase but never had one catch fire for no apparent reason.
I swapped back to a set of all nFET Chinese ESCs, next they will be getting the BLHeli firmware port for Atmel processors which allegedly can be easily tuned to work well with high pole count motors, unlike SimonK that requires recompiling and uploading to change anything. I'm using the BLHeli on a few different Silabs based ESCs and it does seem to work much better than any other ESC/firmware combo I've used so time will tell if this is the ultimate answer but I will not trust the Castle ESCs again, their reputation for pyrotechnic displays on RC Helis while in flight seems to continue with the M/R line of products.
Ken
Unfortunately I have found that allowing for general user error (which is the cause of the vast majority of problems -speaking from personal experience here) with electronics, **** happens. Not sayingyou did anything wrong, on the contrary, your was likely meticulous. But, doesn't matter how good a product or brand is, sometimes stuff just fails. To label that brand as no good is Ott in my opinion. Have you ever down with an airline that has never had an accident or driven a car where nine of the components ever failed and then refused to ever use that beans again? Not realistic.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Hey, did it ever occur that it might be the mistakes your making or lack of building skills?
I spoke with Castle, and they haven't heard from you and your flame out esc's, did you contact them?? If so who?
I'm done discussing this with you.
Has anyone ever had an issue with throttle send being odd after an upgrade? I just installed the firmware for the standard (for hex) from basic on the FC (followed manual AND SleepyC instructions). Seemed to go well based on the fact hex shows up, software loaded fine etc. rebooted software and changes had written and were present.
calibrated ESCs throttle fine. ESC/motors work fine with throttle cal harness direct from throttle out of RX.
Set up RX with sbus to superx, and ESCS beeping crazy saying throttle is not in the low position. Tried standard servo cables instead of sbus - same beeps. Tried different Tx/RX, no good.
I did did a stock cal hoping that would work - no love.
Seems like the FC to me.
Any thoughts?
thanks
You need to recalibrate your sticks for neutral and end point.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
OK. It turns out that Drew from Xaircraft got back to me and said that the FC should be fine with the Opto. Not sure what to make of that, but....I realized I had the wrong option for the ESC within the software. Changing the option to the alternate (not normal - I think called UltraPWM) stopped the constant beeping.
However, now I get a consistent beep that the ESC manual says is (I think - hard to understand what Hobby Wing means by their "beep" description) "throttle signal lost or irregular." This happens with both sbus and traditional servo lead connection.
This has been tried with sticks inverted and not, with limits (end points) changed to -125/+125 and stock (100), and with trims lowered all the way in small increments to see if I could get the damn beeping to stop.
The Tx controls the flight modes etc in all these configurations.
At a total loss here...
Do NOT use UltraPWM. These were a special ESC that XAircraft no longer makes. I've got a few of them hanging around in my storage bins. Change your setup to Standard ESC.
Jeff
Posted from my phone using Tapatalk Pro.