seagee
Member
It might be useful to initiate a discussion by users who have tested their S800 X, Y & Z settings for IMU and GPS to optimize these.
Is it fair to assume that the Z axis COG on the S800 would, by default, be higher than that of a flat hex due to the upwardly inclined arms (motors are higher than the centre plate) with an equivalent under-slung payload (batteries & camera mount)?
Hanging an arm of my craft from the ceiling with a full payload gives me a Z axis COG roughly in line with the IMU.
My configuration details on the S800 are as follows:
My GPS is located in the middle of the centre plate (thus no X or Y offsets required) and vertically raised on a tall mast 15cm from IMU centre to GPS centre. IMU location should be constant across all S800s - I chose an IMU X offset value of -6.
My IMU settings are: X: -6, Y: 0 and Z: 0.
My GPS settings are: X: 0, Y: 0 and Z: -15
My flight behaviour seems smoother since 5.12a but I have not had the opportunity to test in windy conditions on this new firmware.
How does this compare with your settings?
Is it fair to assume that the Z axis COG on the S800 would, by default, be higher than that of a flat hex due to the upwardly inclined arms (motors are higher than the centre plate) with an equivalent under-slung payload (batteries & camera mount)?
Hanging an arm of my craft from the ceiling with a full payload gives me a Z axis COG roughly in line with the IMU.
My configuration details on the S800 are as follows:
My GPS is located in the middle of the centre plate (thus no X or Y offsets required) and vertically raised on a tall mast 15cm from IMU centre to GPS centre. IMU location should be constant across all S800s - I chose an IMU X offset value of -6.
My IMU settings are: X: -6, Y: 0 and Z: 0.
My GPS settings are: X: 0, Y: 0 and Z: -15
My flight behaviour seems smoother since 5.12a but I have not had the opportunity to test in windy conditions on this new firmware.
How does this compare with your settings?