Brushless Gimbal Developments

[DennyR]

Thanks Boris I need to look at that.

 

[Bartman]

DennyR if you check the rcgroups thread on the AQ developments on the gimbal etc. the last couple posts were only about winding motors and they mentioned also motor with more poles. Jussi considered that more poles could give a higher resolution or smoother movement. Also in the Rcrgoups there is a whole sub forum about winding motors !

Boris

which thread are you referring to Boris?

 

[BorisS]

which thread are you referring to Boris?

I ll have a look and get the info together !

Boris

 

[BorisS]

info starting here:

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1815204&page=24

rcgeoups quote "

28 or 32 poles should not be a problem, in fact it would be an advantage in terms of smoothness and cogging tendencies. The SunnySky/DualSky motors would be my preferred choice right now for a bigger load."

<tbody>
</tbody>

 

[BorisS]

http://i.caendle.de/dev/test2/ tool

pretty sure motors ready for usage are going to be sold soon. I won't bother with starting with that !

 

[chopper]

Yes, I think its only going to be a few weeks before you'll be able to get a variety of motors made by existing vendors. My piggy bank looks really nervous. It knows whats coming.

 

[Bartman]

I've got a Tiger 4008-12 in the parts bin downstairs.....something tells me surgery is imminent. 18 poles, time to start reading.

 

[Bartman]

info starting here:

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1815204&page=24

rcgeoups quote "

28 or 32 poles should not be a problem, in fact it would be an advantage in terms of smoothness and cogging tendencies. The SunnySky/DualSky motors would be my preferred choice right now for a bigger load."

<tbody>
</tbody>

if it isn't already available i may be able to get a translation of the subtitles in the video.

 

[DennyR]

Bart that would be excellent.

I have already started rewinding MT 4008 and 3506. plenty of scope to remove a lot of weight at the same time.