Not as dumb as having a Giant Scale 3d RC contest with a night time fireworks display with people flying RC helis and 30lb+ airplanes though the detonation zone while the fireworks are being deployed. The planes have the ability to glide into the crowd after having power knocked out or corkscrew towards anywhere if the empennage is damaged.
I don't think there's anything wrong with selling them, but to fail to address the responsibilities and risks to buyers and spectators at point of sale is another issue altogether. How many sellers provide any kind of operational info to buyers? Lacking knowledge and education people will fail to recognize they acquired responsibilities with their newly acquired "toy".
Ronan,
Your point is of course valid in the broad sense but until the advent of relatively inexpensive, self stabilized MR's this wasn't much of a problem. RC cars can be pretty hard on curbs and fences but RC helis and airplanes had, and still have, a tendency to take a dirt nap long before achieving altitude over an unsuspecting crowd. The smaller electric planes and helis are typically too light and too slow to be much of a threat to much other than spectator eyesight, which is of course very, very bad, but usually don't have the potential for causing death. Until MR's we didn't experiencing idiots launching them over crowds in the middle of cities. Idiots utilizing FPV to do whatever they wanted wherever they wanted was predicted a long, long time ago to become a serious issue that would have great and negative impact on the aerial RC enthusiast. I've been deeply involved in aerial RC activities for well over 45 years and until this past year or so never, ever, heard of or experienced anything like what we are seeing now.
A little indirect, but I see where you're going and I have to say I generally agree. Let the municipalities form their own regulations for these activities and prosecute accordingly. Concur 100%. However, our government prefers federalizing everything it can, and if not specifically permitted, prohibit the activity or legislate fees for permitted use. Worst case is only permit those that have barrels of money to contribute in whatever format to play in a particular playground. Without major political contributions people should not be able to play. Where airspace is concerned the FAA has owned all of it since the responsibility was handed over to them by the original CAA.
So, do we advocate for individual registration numbers applied at time of sale to each new model sold? How about registering motors, FC's and ESC's at time of sale? Something like that is probably coming in one form or another because outside of an outright ban of the products that's the only way various authority groups will be able to track and apprehend people that think public safety is something only applicable to others, with themselves exempt.
Bear in mind I like the way you think but logic is always defied by a government.
Aircraft are ban from flying near fireworks.
Also it's been discussed to death, if your phantom has a fly away, switch to manual and bring it back. DJI is at fault for not making that clear, users are also at fault for not doing enough research about this problem.
I don't see people being ridiculed for doing new things. However I do see people being ridiculed for not having a clue what they are doing and putting others in danger. The fireworks video had a lot of other footage flying over a huge crowd of people. There have been comments that it was in a restricted area, that the organisers hired the person etc. I saw a video of the operator being interviewed and he had no idea that anything he did was unsafe. I would think that just plain old common sense would kick in and you wouldn't need anyone to tell you that flying a Phantom over crowds of people via FPV beyond line of sight at night probably isn't sensible. Personally, I'd like to see this person charged and fined. Now that would be some good footage.Why would anyone want to even buy a drone knowing if they try to do something new with it they will be made the focus of ridicule?
I don't think there's anything wrong with selling them, but to fail to address the responsibilities and risks to buyers and spectators at point of sale is another issue altogether. How many sellers provide any kind of operational info to buyers? Lacking knowledge and education people will fail to recognize they acquired responsibilities with their newly acquired "toy".
Aircraft are ban from flying near fireworks.
Also it's been discussed to death, if your phantom has a fly away, switch to manual and bring it back. DJI is at fault for not making that clear, users are also at fault for not doing enough research about this problem.