Convincing demonstration
I know I've been harping on about this, but I really am curious to understand the performance/behaviour of this gimbal - specifically the "16mm lens only" thing - and I haven't seen any clear explanation of it yet. That Zeiss 18mm lens is a lump compared to the 16mm Sony. So obviously the gimbal is a fair way out of balance on the pitch axis. Is the problem that there is no provision for shifting the camera forwards/backwards in order to restore the CG? Or is it something in the firmware knowing the acceleration/torque to apply to a specific mass? Or something else?
I know I've been harping on about this, but I really am curious to understand the performance/behaviour of this gimbal - specifically the "16mm lens only" thing - and I haven't seen any clear explanation of it yet. That Zeiss 18mm lens is a lump compared to the 16mm Sony. So obviously the gimbal is a fair way out of balance on the pitch axis. Is the problem that there is no provision for shifting the camera forwards/backwards in order to restore the CG? Or is it something in the firmware knowing the acceleration/torque to apply to a specific mass? Or something else?